A Treatise on Regional Iodine Therapy for The Veterinary Clinician
9781465671097
213 pages
Library of Alexandria
Overview
While it is a fact that iodine is one of the most popular of the many medicinal agents used by the practitioner of veterinary medicine and surgery, it also is a fact that iodine—more so than any other agent—is frequently used in pathological conditions and under circumstances that lack every scientific indication for its application. To a certain extent this is true of almost any medicinal agent in common use, even those whose field of applicability is less broad than that of iodine; but it is especially noteworthy in the use of iodine. Iodine does not differ from any other therapeutic agent with regard to individual indications for its application; it has these as prominently marked as have the alkaloids, physiologically. But it does differ from almost all other therapeutical agents in the fact that, it has such a vast field of applicability in which the indications for its use are supported solely by clinical evidence and in which its action defies all attempts at an explanation of results attained, on a physiological basis. Although the practitioner may not be able to satisfy his ethical desire to explain the action of preparations of iodine in the latter class of pathological conditions, he soon makes the discovery that these actions and results are, to a very considerable degree, dependent upon more or less well-marked clinical and physical phenomena. In order to be able to give to his use of iodine, in its various forms, even a semblance of ethical practice, and, also, in order to be able to roughly classify and select the conditions in which he may use iodine with some expectation of uniform results, it becomes imperative that the practitioner acquaint himself with these facts and phenomena. Not only this, but he must acquaint himself, as well, with the peculiar and individual effects and actions, in a clinical sense, of the different forms in which iodine is used as a topical or regional application. What may be an indication for the use of iodine in one form, may lack the requisite pathological status for its application in a successful manner in one of its other forms. Thus, in a given pathological condition, an ointment of iodine may fall far short of the therapeutic power that the practitioner expects it to exert, despite the fact that the case is clearly one for iodine therapy. When, on the other hand, in the same case, use is made of the tincture of iodine, or of an aqueous solution of iodine, the desired results may be obtained with almost amazing promptness. Again, in another class of cases, the reverse may be true.
